DESCHENE LAW OFFICE

Call us today for a consultation 800-347-1097. Mr. Deschene has eighteen years of experience with federal and state appellate courts. He directly represents clients who want to maximize their chances of winning their appeal, and trial attorneys who are appealing a case but do not have the time to write appellate briefs. Member of MA, RI and ME Bars. Visit my WEBSITE at www.resourcelegalwriting.com.
February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  

DISCLAIMERS

This website/blog is designed only to provide generalized information for potential clients of my appellate law practice, and none of this information should be construed by the user as my providing legal advice, or as a representation that specific postings pertain or do not pertain to the user's particular circumstances. Your use of this website/blog in no way creates an attorney-client relationship, nor should such use be a substitute for your seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney in your own jurisdiction. Any user comments on this blog are moderated. I will not post any user's comment containing personal information or specific legal questions without the user's prior consent. If you have particular legal questions, please feel free to call me at 800-347-1097. All blog postings are the sole property of the author, and cannot be reproduced without the author's prior written consent. I do welcome links and trackbacks to this blog.

CA1: Forum Selection Clause in Medical Consent Form Enforceable

          In Rivera v. Centro Medico de Turabo, No. 07-2657 (July 31, 2009), the First Circuit (Lipez, J.) held that a forum selection clause in a hospital’s medical consent form, which required plaintiff to litigate his medical malpractice claim only in state court, was enforceable.
          Prior to his admission for prostate cancer surgery, Rivera signed [...]

CA1: Equitable Estoppel Bars Family Medical Leave Liability of Government Employer

          In Nagle v. Acton-Boxborough Regional School District, No. 08-2374 (July 30, 2009), the First Circuit has held that a government employee cannot invoke equitable estoppel to hold her employer liable for its oral assurances that her leave of absence to care for her ailing husband would be covered by the Family Medical Leave Act [...]

SJC: Double Jeopardy Test Strictly “Elements-of-the-Crime”

          In Commonwealth v. Vick, No. SJC-10385 (July 30, 2009), the SJC has reaffirmed the strict “elements-of-the-crime” test for determining whether, consistent with double jeopardy prohibitions, a defendant can be punished for two different crimes arising out of a single course of conduct.
          Vick allegedly shot his victim once in the chest at close range. [...]

SJC: Attorney’s Lien Statute Applies To Patent Prosecution Work

          In Ropes & Gray v. Jalbert, No. SJC-10333 (July 28, 2009), the SJC has held that the Massachusetts attorney’s lien statute permits attorneys to place a lien on a patent (and any proceeds later derived from that patent) for legal fees earned while representing a client in obtaining the patent before the United States [...]

SJC: Employment Discrimination Claims Not Arbitrable Absent Unambiguous Contract Provision

          In Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, No. SJC-10375 (June 27, 2009), the SJC has held that, unless an employment contract unambiguously provides that its mandatory arbitration provision applies to an employee’s statutory employment discrimination claim, the employee cannot be compelled to  arbitration on that claim.
           Warfield, who worked as anesthesiologist-in-chief at Beth [...]

SJC: Secondary Detentions at Sobriety Checkpoints Constitutional

          In Commonwealth v. Swartz, No. SJC-10426 (July 23, 2009) and Commonwealth v. Murphy, No. SJC-10287 (July 23, 2009), the SJC has held that written police guidelines which permit police officers at sobriety checkpoints to direct particular vehicles to a nearby detention area for further investigation are constitutional.
          Defendants challenged the guidelines because they provided [...]

CA1: Law of the Case Doctrine Bars Revisiting Settle Issues in Successive Sentencing Appeals

          In United States v. Wallace, 07-1884 (1st Cir. July 23, 2009), the First Circuit (Lipez, J.) has held that the “law of the case” doctrine may bar appellants whose sentences previously were vacated and remanded on appeal from raising in a successive appeal from their new sentence legal arguments which they did not raise, [...]

CA1: En Banc Court Will Decide Whether Rule 10b-5 Imposes Primary Liability on Underwriters

          The First Circuit has decided to rehear en banc the panel decision in SEC v. Tambone, 550 F.3d 106 (1st Cir. 2008), which held that the Securities and Exchange Commission could hold two security underwriters personally liable under Rule 10b-5 for false statements contained in prospectuses they disseminated, even though they themselves had not [...]

CA1: For Career Offender, No Presumption of Reliability for Non-Judicial Records Establishing Prior Conviction’s Existence

           In United States v. Bryant, No. 08-1160 (1st Cir. July 8, 2009), the First Circuit has held that the government was not entitled to a presumption that non-judicial records that it adduced to prove the existence of a prior conviction for purposes of characterizing defendant as a “career offender” were sufficiently reliable. 
            The government [...]

CA1: No Instruction Mandated in Federal Court for Police Failure to Record Custodial Interrogation

     
          In United States v. Meadows, No. 08-1122 (July 8, 2009), the First Circuit has held that a defendant in a federal criminal case, unlike in Massachusetts courts, is not entitled to a jury instruction cautioning jurors about failure by police to record his inculpatory statement made during a custodial interrogation.
          The Massachusetts SJC [...]

SJC: Absent Consent of Parties, Juries Cannot Engage in Pre-deliberation Discussions

          In Kelly v. Foxboro Realty Assocs., No. SJC-10294 (July 16, 2009), the SJC has held that trial courts have no discretion, absent the consent of the parties, to instruct jurors in civil cases that they may discuss evidence among themselves during the trial.
           The Court noted that, since it flatly prohibited such a jury [...]

SJC: Prosecution May Use Multiple “First Complaint” Witnesses If Victim Reports Distinct Incidences of Sexual Abuse

          In Commonwealth v. Kebreau, No. SJC-10317 (July 16, 2009), the SJC has held that the “first complaint doctrine,” which normally limits the prosecution to introducing only the testimony of the first person to whom a victim of sexual abuse reported the abuse, is not violated where two witnesses each report different incidences involving distinct [...]

CA1: Attorney Fees Recoverable in Proceeding to Confirm or Vacate Chapter 93A Arbitral Award

          In Janney Montgomery Scott v. Tobin, No. 08-1863 (July 8, 2009), the First Circuit has held that a party may recover for the attorney fees it incurs when it moves in federal district court to vacate or confirm an arbitration award on a Chapter 93A unfair business practices claim.
      Trustees filed a Chapter 93A-based [...]

CA1: Younger Abstention Not Bar To MCAD Claim Based on Disability Discrimination

         In Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. Medley, Nos. 08-2332 & 08-2379 (1st Cir. 7/8/09), the First Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctrine precluded the federal district court from enjoining a pending case before the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) in which an employee alleged that an insurer discriminated her by [...]

CA1: Mandatory Retirement for Police and Firefighters Does Not Violate ADEA

          In Correa-Ruiz v. Garcia, No. 06-2578 (1st Cir. 7/7/09), the First Circuit has held that Puerto Rico’s 2005 statute which requires police and firefighters to retire at age 58 did not violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) or the federal due process clause.
      In 1974, Congress extended the ADEA to the States, [...]

CA1: Current Immigration Law Precludes Derivative Asylum Status for Spouses

         In Cendrawasih v. Holder, No. 08-2178 (7/2/09), the First Circuit has affirmed the Board of Immigration’s denial of witholding of deportation and asylum to an Indonesian woman whose husband previously was granted asylum in the United States.  The immigration judge determined that, unlike her husband, petitioner could relocate to another part of Indonesia where [...]

SJC: Consumers Cannot Waive Right to Class-Action Arbitration Under Chapter 93A

          In Feeney v. Dell, Inc., No. SJC-10259 (7/2/09), the SJC has held that a consumer contract provision requiring that purchasers arbitrate their unfair business practices claims individually against a retailer could not be enforced to preclude purchasers from participating in a class-action arbitration against the retailer because such a contractual waiver is void as [...]

SJC: Patdown Search for Pocket-Reaching Defendant Upheld

          In Commonwealth v. Johnson, No. SJC-10267 (6/26/09), the SJC affirmed a motion to suppress evidence seized during a patdown frisk, based on defendant’s refusal to remove his hands from his pockets during an investigatory stop in a “high crime” neighborhood.
         While patrolling a neighborhood well known for drug activity and gang violence, Springfield police [...]

SJC: Bank Customers Fail to Adduce Evidence Banks Did Not Use “Ordinary Care” Processing Forged Checks

          In Grassi Design Group v. Bank of America, No. SJC-08-927 (June 23, 2009), the SJC has affirmed the grant of summary judgment for banks sued by their commercial customers for processing and paying out on checks forged by the customers’ employees.
          Plaintiffs sued for reimbursement under the Uniform Commercial Code, M.G.L. ch. 106, § [...]

SJC: Criminal Defendants Entitled to Evidentiary Hearing Before Forfeiting Right to Counsel

          In Commonwealth v. Means, No. SJC-10262 (June 12, 2009), the SJC has defined the procedural safeguards that must be observed before a criminal defendant is deprived of his constitutional right to appointive counsel on the ground that he forfeited that right by engaging in violent or threatening conduct.
      Means, who had a history of [...]